The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Geopbyte[edit]

The result was already deleted. Some Wiki Editor (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Geopbyte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed name for a data storage space unit. Has not been widely accepted, nor is there any machine available with such amount of data space. The article was speedily deleted twice on request by other editors - I thought I'd give this an AfD to settle the matter. Travelbird (talk) 09:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Neologism; cited sources are not reliable. Feezo (Talk) 09:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Sources are not reliable (one random "what is" page and two forum links); the last link does not mention the term. Could not turn up anything reliable in modern textbooks or papers; note there is an unleated biology term which could confuse searches. Kuru (talk) 14:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete under WP:CSD#G5 (created by blocked user) since it was created by Mr ArticleEditor (talk · contribs), a sock of SirEpicBob (talk · contribs). (Article already tagged for speedy.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.