The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Dennis - 01:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GeoLotto[edit]

GeoLotto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with abt. 6500 Google hits. Also (self?)promo for this in mid September 2014 launched lottery. The Banner talk 15:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The former name GeoSweep also brings up less than 6k hits. The Banner talk 15:42, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) NorthAmerica1000 20:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:08, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.