The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genos Research[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional, and no adequate sources for notability DGG ( talk ) 19:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no lead section, no real context and nothing proving its notablilty. PCN02 WPS 19:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Borderline A7 + G11. No real attempt has been made to make it remotely presentable; no value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.