The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generation Einstein[edit]

This is the re-creation of a page that was previously prod-deleted. The text is almost identical to previous version, which was an advertisement for a book about this non-notable protologism. The only source for this article is that same book and the only author is the same author of the previously deleted version, whose only edits are to this page or a draft version in their userspace. I believe this user may have a conflict of interest, but because this page is their only contribution, there is not sufficient material to post at COIN. All google results for this term point back at this same book, so again it appears that Wikipedia is being used as a platform to promote and sell more copies of the same. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 18:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete non-notable protologism. As an aside, if this is to judge by:" creative and multidisciplinary thinking of Albert Einstein than with the rational, logical and linear thinking of Isaac Newton" the book is of little value. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 21:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - appears to be essentially advertising, as the only use of this term is in this (non-notable) book. Terraxos (talk) 22:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Essentially unused and unknown.DGG (talk) 12:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Essentially advertising. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.