The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 01:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gamestyle[edit]

Gamestyle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Tagged for speedy but asserts notability, albeit weakly. Is this site the subject of multiple non-trivial external coverage? Guy (Help!) 10:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Many thousands of relevant google hits. YechielMan 15:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 16:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Definitely notable. --Dariusk 19:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. No real reason for deletion. --mattcoxonline 13:59, 13 April 2007 (GMT)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.