The result was merge to GNU_GRUB#Variants. SilkTork *YES! 21:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No notability indicated, no reliable third party sources. -- Jeandré, 2009-04-30t16:22z 16:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(my 2c, suggest to keep the article GRUB4DOS) My suggestion is to keep the article: reasons are:--
Notability: this seems to be notable as a potentially important extension or adaptation of an important free software GNU GRUB into a new field of application to a widespread operating system.
Reliable third party sources: The external source cited is gna.org, which seems to be independent of the grub4dos authors, and hosting a number of free-software projects. This looks reliable under WP:RS.
Information (Googleability and linkablitiy from other articles) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panarchy (talk • contribs) 11:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Terry0051 (talk) 21:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]