The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Futtize[edit]

Futtize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have speedied this article before, but the creator moved it across the very next day through his sandbox and I missed it. Looks like an indie artist to me, and none of the references given come from a big source (they are either blogs or self sourced from this very wiki page). He has never charted, and claims to be more of an "accompanying artist" rather than an independent act. Dengero (talk) 04:12, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non notable artist. Looks more like a vanity project than an encyclopedic article. No real indication of portability discussion of output restricted to a very small number of releases on India labels. Fenix down (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JayJayWhat did I do? 01:30, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.