The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Furler[edit]

Furler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominator has withdrawn nominationOnly one of the furlers is notable enough to have a page on this wiki Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Boleyn: Sia is not the only notable Furler, as there are more than one other notable Furler that is notable enough to have a page on Wikipedia. Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 11:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ssjhowarthisawesome, you haven't read my comment correctly. I was pointing out that you made two mistakes here - firstly, thinking a surname page with only one entry should be deleted rather than redirected, if there really was no way of improving it (see WP:ATD) and secondly that you didn't try to improve the page WP:BEFORE nominating it for deletion. I know there are other notable people, as I said in my comment, and I'm the one who improved the page. Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.