The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 07:14, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funeral For My Chemical Valentine[edit]

Funeral For My Chemical Valentine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fictitious dawkeye (talk) 12:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A bunch of middle aged men have nothing better to do with their time than try to delete articles on wikipedia that have nothing to do with them, Sad. Granthardie (talk) 22:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't leave the ladies out of your scorn. Equal time, you know. :)--Fabrictramp (talk) 00:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A bunch of teenagers who have nothing better to do with their time than try to add articles on wikipedia that no one cares about, Sad. JuJube (talk) 11:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yet it's not wasting time to look on google and amazon for whether it exists or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Granthardie (talk • contribs) 12:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm let's see five google hits most using the term to describe a mocking amalgam of the bands Funeral for a Friend, My Chemical Romance and Bullet for My Valentine. Amazon gives me no matches. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 13:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's what it means. MCR was the only one of those bands I'd heard of. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 14:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.