The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of sources; however, a close examination reveals that the majority don't even mention Fundable or are press releases. The only sources that might meet WP:RS are local coverage from "Columbus Business First." Bottom line: not seeing WP:GNG or WP:CORP depth of coverage being met for this relatively young (March 2012) crowdfunding startup. Crowdfunding is one of the current buzzwords right now; no point in creating articles about all of these up-and-comers until they start getting significant coverage. FWIW, created by a WP:SPA. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One thing that is interesting about this one (which they don't say) is that they took over the domain name from old fundable.com, the one by John Pratt. By my count Pratt's fundable was the first crowdfunding site operating with an all or nothing model. Old Fundable got a lot of press, some of it quite bad in the end.
Maybe there could be an article about old fundable.com, mentioning that it's not related to new fundable.com. 77.16.222.168 (talk) 21:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - I believe there are no longer any press releases listed as sources in the article. There are articles written by several independent news organizations (including Slashgear, PandoDaily, and Biz Journals). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janeesah (talk • contribs) 13:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]