The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. or nom withdrawn. TravellingCari 20:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frederic Colier[edit]

Frederic Colier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Disputed prod. Article has been enhanced with a further notability claim - that he played in a notable band before they became notable. That might stand up, but I'm unconvinced and the lack of RS doesn't help. I'd love the article to develop into a proper, sourced stub of a notable jack of all trades (films, plays, novels, music) but I'm concerned it's an unsourced stub about a nn master of none. Dweller (talk) 12:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I tried several searches, combining his name with each of the claimed professions one by one. There seems to be quite a bit online about him. A true rennaisance man. I think notability should be a lock, and may take a crack at this myself. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • That'd be great. If you can find some good RS to add to the article, I'll be happy to rescind the nomination. After all, I'm hardly some great deletionist. --Dweller (talk) 09:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done a bit of cleanup, expansion, and sourcing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Expanded and sourced article is convincing. --Lockley (talk) 14:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Struck nom. Great job of providing RS. --Dweller (talk) 20:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Appreciate your encouragement and consideration. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.