The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Somewhat procedural, as this has been sitting since June without discussion. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frank cappuccino[edit]

Frank cappuccino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The subject's importance isn't listed, only peacock terms are used. StaticGull  Talk  15:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. Cappuccino does have a a long history as a boxing official. However, this article is unsourced, appears to be a copy-and-paste from somewhere, and as it stands now is a piece of crap. I would work on it myself — if I weren't headed out for vacation right now. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. The article needs work, and to be moved to Frank Cappucino, but it's only a few weeks old, so I would suggest that it is better to mark it as needing clean-up and references for now, and come back to an AfD if no improvement follows. Bondegezou (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.