The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Kelly Rich[edit]

Frank Kelly Rich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does not meet WP:V, WP:RS, WP:N, or WP:BIO, there are no sources or external links or even any inline references the article does not even assert the subjects notability, if he does exists its possibly a BLP violation as well. Cholga^talK! 03:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Delete'Delete-not a notable or sourced person/article.Cholga^talK! 03:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Keep'Keep. I added some references. The profile from the San Francisco Chronicle is quite lengthy. Rich is also a book author. --Eastmain (talk) 04:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 04:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems notable. Here's another major newspaper source (a bio then an interview in connection with the book)[1]. Also note that the nominator is a suspected sockpuppet account that has been nominating quite a number of articles. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Boomgaylove‎ . That would suggest a speedy close.Wikidemo (talk) 21:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.