The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fowling (sport)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a minor sport, failing WP:GNG. Mdann52 (talk) 08:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - While admittedly a "minor sport," this does indeed pass GNG as it has mainstream publications such as The Detroit News and The Detroit Metro-Times covering it. This is not to say that there isn't some BS to be pared from the piece. It does seem to merit a GNG pass, however. Carrite (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Purely local phenomenon with a scattering of local coverage. Something to pad a newspaper with on a slow news day. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.