The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Others on the talk page raised concerns about the credibility/validity of this article about 10 years ago [1].
Although I attempted to revamp the lead, it became extremely clear to me that this article's sources are only primary sources, and that this entire piece seems extremely self-promoation. In order for this to be possibly made into a credible/balanced wikipedia article a lot of work is needed, and that assumes that it even warrents a page. As far as I can tell, this is not a commonly used measure. (And I say that as someone who teaches classes about personality psychology and psychological testing.) Mason (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)