The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Formulae of shapes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A poorly formatted, weekly referenced, indiscriminate collection of formula duplicating Area#Area_formulas, Perimeter and other articles. It a near orphan. )) Salix alba (talk): 22:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; there's nothing more to say about it. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as too indiscriminate - "some formulae of some shapes", and those already covered elsewhere... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:57, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above. Also, these are formulae related to some shapes, but not the formulae of those shapes, which (to me at least) would be the equations that yield those shapes when graphed. XOR'easter (talk) 18:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.