- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to XForms#Implementation technologies compared. Tone 20:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- FormFaces (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet NOTABILITY. Possible ATD is merge to XForms. Boleyn (talk) 14:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This should be a slamdunk, honestly. Zero coverage in reliable sources save for casual mentions or namedrops. Fails the GNG by a country mile. Ravenswing 09:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to XForms#Implementation_technologies_compared, where it is already mentioned in a better context. Basic facts about this XForms implementation are verifiable and the term is a plausible search term. Merging the sources may be useful, too.--
((u|Mark viking)) {Talk}
10:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.