The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep references are existent. Article makes a credible assertion of significance. --43?9enter☭msg☭contribs 02:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Whlie article contents are rather short, I believe a closer look at the sources, which are plenty, would give a slight boost in article expansion here. hmssolent\Let's convene 04:28, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep found third party reviews, like this. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.