The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Following the Voice of Blood[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - to correct a misinterpretation/assumption in the nomination. The guideline WP:MUSIC says that demos are general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 00:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ True, demos are not guaranteed to be non-notable, but they can be assumed to be unless proven otherwise. So both comments are true. Since no one has demonstrated notability here... David V Houston (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is actually a full-length studio album, pre-released as a 2-track demo. It is not a demo. Moswento (talk) 07:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If this were a true demo, with no outside sources, then yes, I would say to delete. However, this was released as a demo first, and then as a full length studio album. Not to mention that No Colours Records, a notable label, still sells this on their site... Undead Warrior (talk) 12:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is the album's image really [1] --Eduardofoxx13 (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ALBUMS. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, "full length studio album" meets WP:NALBUMS. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 04:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Seven tracks (intro/outro aren't tracks) is an EP, not an album. Stifle (talk) 09:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: From Extended play, "a CD single usually having around 10–28 minutes of music, a CD EP up to 36 minutes, and an album generally 30–80 minutes." This has over an hour (60+ minutes). Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 13:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable per WP:ALBUMS as it isn't just a demo but a full length studio album release too. It does need more sources, but that's not a reason to delete in this case. Alzarian16 (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per info found above, changing my !vote. David V Houston (talk) 22:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.