The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Horse[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced article that is either an hoax or a badly written advertisement. damiens.rf 17:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Nothing else to add. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obviously. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - Non notable ride .–Davey2010 • (talk) 03:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge it into the Leofoo Village Theme Park article - there is mention of, and a photo of, the "flying horses" ride in that article so it does exist, but it is not notable enough for an article by itself. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find a reason why this component of the park is special. Antrocent (♫♬) 02:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with Tiptoe there. CesareAngelotti (talk) 22:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable ride. There really isn't anything to merge, the only content is an unreferenced description of the ride. Philg88 ^♦talk 14:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.