The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 00:19, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flexenclosure[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company, the awards are not what they appear: for example, in 2011 there were several dozen International Green award winners in various categories. The other awards are for quite narrow categories also, Thje references are mere notices of particular projects. DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I am a bit perplexed at this nomination. The awards might not be very important, but awards aren'tr necessary for notability. Non-notable companies do not get "mere notices of projects" (=articles about specific projects) published in mainstream newspapers across multiple continents. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be kept. It's pretty niche but seems like worthwhile knowledge for those in the business. HenryVanBaal (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have to say it should be kept as well. Seems like noteworthy awards. per GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:41, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.