The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 10:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FlexTraining[edit]

FlexTraining (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable company. Lacks 3rd party sources. The only Google hits I'm finding are to the company itself or to the unrelated training offered by Adobe for it's products. The only Google news hits I'm finding are to press releases put out by this company. RadioFan (talk) 17:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Plenty notable. Kiwikibble (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable enough for inclusion. Most Google results seem to reference the Adobe Flex (training) product rather than this company, and so the amount of results for FlexTraining can be deceiving. WAT (talk • contributions) 16:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Totally promotional. No news sources mention it. A handful of e-learning books mention it,[1][2][3][4] but none actually discuss it. Fences and windows (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no reliable sources. Rami R 07:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.