The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fittr (app)[edit]

Fittr (app) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Started by WP:SPA, the coverage is based on routine events, like funding rounds, etc. Fails WP:NCORP. US-Verified (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source #9, the rest aren't helpful for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oaktree b Deccan Chronicle is a press release-type article without any proper byline. It is not what we call significant coverage. Financial Express is a trade publication. We need more than routine coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. US-Verified (talk) 02:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oaktree b just did some searching and that exact same article also appears on unrelated websites such as [the "Brand Equity" section of the India Time] and was published the day before on the "Marketing" section of the e4M (a marketing company) website. HighKing++ 19:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Deccan Chronicle chronicle above is a business name report from the business. It doesn't prove its notable. Its fails WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creepTalk 09:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.