The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finball[edit]

Finball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page itself directly admits that it is a violation of WP:NFT, as something some university kids made up a month before the "article" appeared. Violates WP:COI - the majority editors are clearly the students/competitors themselves, as the bulk of the edits by most of them are them adding their own names as new "champions". Violates WP:V and WP:RS, in that it not only cites no sources, there appear to be none in existence (exhaustive Google searches on things like "Finball pool -Wikipedia" and "Finball billiard -Wikipedia" find nothing relevant). Violates WP:NOT in a couple of ways, as the page is being used as a promotional web page for the new game, and the flurry of personal updates means the page is essentially being used as something akin to a blog and a clique message board by a group of friends. In short, this isn't any different from any other entry that WP:CUE has added to our list of previously deleted bogus cue sports articles, the re-creation of which we keep an eye out for. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 10:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.