The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 19:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final Destination 3 DVD[edit]

Final Destination 3 DVD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

There has been no attempt to merge the content into Final Destination 3, which was the decision of the first AFD over two months ago. Per the tag, "If the merger is not completed promptly, this article might be re-nominated for deletion." For a valid merge result this time there should be evidence that this is being carried out adequately. The Final Destination 3 article is a mess, but copy and pasting this trash into it will not help.
The reason for deletion is the same as its first AFD: fancruft, and special edition DVDs do not need their own pages. The JPS^{talk to me} 00:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, once all the fancruft is lost, I reckon this could be cut down to one four-line paragraph. The JPS^{talk to me} 01:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. People shouldn't make false promises to merge, if it never happens. Wikipedia isn't a DVD guide to special editions. RobJ1981 00:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Davidbober 01:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fancruft, unless someone actually merges the articles -- Selmo ^(talk) 01:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it's obviously not important enough for anyone to go to the trouble to merge, so just vape this cruft. JuJube 02:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fancruft.--Jersey Devil 04:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Delete Is someone going to merge these two? Alex43223 ^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 07:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom ThrustVectoring 08:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom this time. No redirect, if the content fails to be merged into the parent article. no merge. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 09:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fancruft, DVDs of films will get a mention in the film's page. Terence Ong 13:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no reason to exist separate of the film article.-- danntm ^T _C 16:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete at this point there has been more than enough time for a merge by any interested parties.--Isotope23 19:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Bucketsofg 19:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom ~ Joe Jklin (T C) 20:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom --Sir James Paul, La gloria è a dio 00:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - this is why if a consensus is reached on an AfD, someone needs to do it themselves. As no attempt to merge has been made, it should be cast away. Dåvid ƒuchs (talk • contribs) 00:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, but can we copy the content to Final Destination 3's talk page so someone can still use it one day? --Arctic Gnome 18:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because DVD version of a movie is not notable by itself. -Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 18:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.