The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Filuk Family Scholarship[edit]

Filuk Family Scholarship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I can find minor mentions in primary sources, I don't see any WP:RS indicating notability by our standards, for what I'm sure is a very helpful program. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I don't even see much of a claim to notability here, much less actual notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree, there is no notability here and I found nothing in the way of reliable sources. Ubelowme _U ^Me 22:53, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Although its wonderful that somebody has provided this scholarship, there is no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 22:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable independent third party sources. If the article is improve to include such sources, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.