The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No quorum, WP:SOFTDELETE Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Film.fm[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage for this search engine for movie pirates. SL93 (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Film.fm was covered twice by Israeli newscasts and is a very popular site worldwide. Orlydumitrescu (talk) 09:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not appear to be notable per WP:WEB, with the proviso that I can't read Hebrew and I'm not able to validate whether the coverage in those articles is substantial. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 22:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.