The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted by Jmlk17 (talk · contribs). soum ^talk 07:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fieldbarer[edit]

Fieldbarer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Cites nothing, and yields no google results, sequel article was deleted. Non-notable IMO Alcemáe ^{T • C} 23:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, if real it is utterly un-notable, but as it is I can find nothing substantial and presume this a WP:HOAX. --Dhartung | Talk 23:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, While possibly a work in progress, the claims of award winning, top rated, etc., and of films having been made, all demand close scrutiny. If not a hoax, the page can be properly recreated. Pever 00:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a hoax, unless someone can find sources verifying claims of "award-winning". Clamster 01:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.