The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fat fetishism -- Samir 22:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feeder (sexual orientation)[edit]

Feeder (sexual orientation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable sexual orientation. A merge is possible, but only if sourced. J Milburn 01:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Redirect to previously merged article as per User:Roleplayer below. See, for example, Citations include[1]. Accounting4Taste 01:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC) Accounting4Taste 04:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - appears to be recognised term. Article needs some work though. Artw 01:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, per below. Artw 01:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep at least one documentary has been made about it. It's late now here in the u.k. but maybe I'll look for extra sources tomorrowMerkinsmum 02:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, however disturbing it might be. Real, valid fetish. Needs sourcing, however. humblefool® 04:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, but see Fat fetishism#Feederism, which is both fatter and prettier (but with nary a citation on the plate). --Dhartung | Talk 05:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Yuck Given the lack of sources, best to delete. No reason to give this the benefit of the doubt. Joestella 08:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Sometimes, just sometimes, I regret learning new things. Nick mallory 08:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• comment see 'fat girls and feeders' [2] was a whole documentary solely about this issue.Merkinsmum 15:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Apologies, this is evidently a notable sexual orientation. Oh well, no harm has come from nominating it. J Milburn 16:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This has been merged into fat fetishism a while ago.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 21:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to previously merged article. -- Roleplayer 01:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a single source is provided, nor is there any claim of notability whatsoever made in the article. Alansohn 06:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Fat fetishism. Notable, but only as a form of the larger topic (pardon the pun). Bearian 00:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• redirect/merge I didn't realise it was already in the Fat fetishism article anyway.Merkinsmum 18:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.