The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete both, a7, amateur football team, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 16:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fc:ssl[edit]

I give props to the author of this page; it is very well-typed and it looks neat. The main problem is that it is about a local football team, and gives no third-party references. If the article is kept, it needs a bit more wikification as well as "references" and "external links" (making sure there is a difference) sections. V-Man737 11:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 15:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, does not assert notability (and rightfully does not do so). – Elisson • T • C • 15:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to closing admin, don't forget to delete Football Club Speke South Liverpool as well. – Elisson • T • C • 15:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - doesn't even give the name of any league they play in, completely non-notable. - fchd 16:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It does actually say they play in the "Leisure Leagues Division One", a Google search on "Leisure Leagues" would appear to suggest this is a locally organised 5/6 a side competition ChrisTheDude 16:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.