- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- FanPro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this is a notable website (or project). It sounds like it was the original name for the company Fantasy Productions which held the BattleTech license. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 06:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 02:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 20:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everyone above - Clearly promo. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 04:15, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sources to indicate notability, and the article is borderline promotional. --Biblioworm 04:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – So far hits on Google are all to non-RS sources. Needs to show that it has been noticed somewhere except blogs and anime fan sites. – Margin1522 (talk) 08:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.