The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 02:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Famous groups of people[edit]

I had originally CSD'd this last night, but I removed the tag because I was no longer certain that this was a candidate for speedy deletion. However, I still am not convinced that this article fulfills notability. It is also currently unsourced and to me looks very strongly to be original research. Trusilver 17:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. List whose inclusion criteria are unclear, and probably cannot be unambiguously specified. Espresso Addict 17:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. The criterion is way too broad. Civilization is built on groups. Are we supposed to list them all? Clarityfiend 17:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Espresso Addict and Clarityfiend Rackabello 17:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - untenable list. The criteria is far too general, and could include a pratically infinite set of sets of two or more people from fiction, history, scientific research, religion, industry... even the list of possible groupings is too long, much less the entries in each that would make this article live up to its name. ◄Zahakiel ► 19:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. VanTucky ^(talk) 22:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very incomplete list and certainly will be hard to maintain itJForget 22:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Zahakiel ; Impossible to have the article maintained. Original Research and POV -Flubeca^Talk 23:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, and as listcruft. Bearian 23:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - About as useful a listcuft as List of stuff would be. Tarc 03:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete worthless cruft Bigdaddy1981 08:47, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Zahakiel. ---Theoldanarchist_Comhrá 16:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.