The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fagdrag[edit]

Fagdrag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD)

Fagdrag is up for deletion because of 1) being a non-notable slang term and 2) the article is trollish in nature. It is the sole contribution of its sole contributor, User:Bjarkia. A Google search reveals that the term exists either in inflammatory environments, or by a different definition. V-Man737 03:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• The article cites no sources. Searching, I can find no good sources that document any such practice. (I discounted Encyclopaedia Dramatica and the dialogue uttered by one character in South Park.) Unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G 16:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I followed in Uncle G's footsteps and came to the same conclusion. CiaranG 11:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete' for all reasons noted above and more. House of Scandal 11:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Clear delete, looks speedy-y to me. Dekimasu 13:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.