The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Gone, no release, no assertion of notability. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 20:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

F.2.D.[edit]

F.2.D. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable unreleased band. A lot of crystal-balling. First single schedulled for 2009. Stay tunned. Damiens.rf 18:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is nothing in the article that makes the band pass WP:MUSIC, and I can't find anything via Google that would pass WP:MUSIC. Article can be recreated in the future if the group becomes notable. Bláthnaid 19:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Bláthnaid 19:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I completely agree with the rationales provided by the nom and Blathnaid. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Unremarkable band, so tagged ukexpat (talk) 19:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.