The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all 7. Fram (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EyeCatcher Entertainment[edit]

EyeCatcher Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Also included in this nomination:

Non-notable film company. Sole claim to fame is an award they won at a Swedish film festival for their 2006 release, Captive. However, the article on the film festival where they won their award was created by the same editor who created the articles on the company, making it highly suspect in my mind. In addition, the only film that has won an award at said festival which has an article on Wikipedia is Captive.

With that said, the only relevant ghits are for Youtube, Myspace, IMDB, Wikipedia, and their official web site. No news coverage I can find. No secondary sources. No reason to believe this company, its films, and the people associated with it are in any way notable. Fails WP:BIO, WP:MOVIE, WP:CORP. Redfarmer (talk) 19:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.