The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme SEO[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Article Clearly is itself an attempt to use wikipedia for SEO, as seen previously in past spamming attempts. Has several links but they seem to be press releases, marketing and merely trivial coverage or mentions. Self-promotion and SEO are NOT the route to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Delete per nomination. Yet another online SEO service advertising on Wikipedia. Referenced to directory listings and spamblogs. It is extremely unlikely that any business of this nature will ever have the sort of historical, technical, or cultural significance that makes for long term historical notability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. Johnclean184 (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:B2B. Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 16:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. Interstellarsheep (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just say no to this kind of spam. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.