The result was delete. All of the content was a copyright violation, which left literally nothing left in the article. That being said, I have no objection to a copyvio-free recreation of the article, as the one keep rationale suggested some notability there. –MuZemike 19:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article states no notability or importance, and I was only able to find one critical review via Google (although this may be somewhat complicated due to the fact that there is an unrelated movie of the same name). It is therefore my belief that the article fails Wp:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Inks.LWC (talk) 10:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]