The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-13 22:43Z

Executioner (EVE)[edit]

There are nearly 200 player-flyable starships in EVE Online. We already have a very detailed (possibly a bit too much) article on the topic of these ships. There is not enough verifiable, NPOV information on the use of every ship to split each out into its own article, nor is this the EVE Wiki. —Dark•Shikari^[T] 11:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - zero assertion of real world significance whatsoever. No assertion of real world significance, or for that matter, notability. Unsourced. Merely a plot summary. There's a few more bits of crap here, but I'm not in the mood to play the deletion game. MER-C 12:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus seemed to decide in some earlier AfDs and DRVs that the 5 races of the game were notable enough to be split off from the main article to allow a more detailed discussion of backstory. The Weapons of EVE Online article, a complete mess, was deleted though. —Dark•Shikari^[T] 13:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Inkpaduta 20:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a strategy guide. --Transfinite 00:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.