The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, G3 by Tnxman307. Blueboy96 16:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution-[edit]

Evolution- (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contents entirely unencyclopedic, and name of article downright disruptive. An editor other than the original author removed speedy deletion nomination for some reason. Move for a speedy delete. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep because evolution is an atheistic lie and Wikipedia isn't supposed to promote any religion or lack thereof. --Silicon-28 (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because evolution is inherently false; a myth created by the mainstrain media to destroy the Christian belief system. Drew Underwood (talk) 16:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete debate of users should take place on talk page of evolution. page already exist. no sources. WP:OR

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.