The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Espond[edit]

Espond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

prod removed, thus listed here. Neologism, self-invented word Passportguy (talk) 20:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't even know that existed! Yes, per WP:NEO, too. Vicenarian (T · C) 20:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to call WP:SNOW on this one.... Vicenarian (T · C) 21:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, per WP:NEO and WP:SNOW too. Highest Heights (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Er, I thought WP:SNOW was invoked to indicate something is pretty much a foregone conclusion (such as the deletion of this article) and debate isn't really all that necessary? Maybe I brought it out too soon. PS: Google it, it's already in the Urban Dictionary. Vicenarian (T · C) 21:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.