The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eruditology[edit]

Nonsensical fake religion, possibly connected with Matthew Martin (which is also up for deletion). Kirill Lokshin 03:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 03:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unverifiable. As stated earlier, Eruditology in relation to Matthew Martin comes up with one result - his Wikipedia article. Capitalistroadster 04:16, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above.Keppa 04:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nonsense religioncruft.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nonsense. Moriori 08:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as hoax and nonsense. A Google test comes up with no references outside Wikipedia. --Elkman - ^(talk) 18:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nonsense, as per my note back on Matthew Martin. --FreelanceWizard 18:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom  Funky Monkey  (talk)  01:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.