The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Author blanked the page. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Junior[edit]

Eric Junior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

He's the personal assistant of someone not notable enough for THEIR own page. Created by a user working for an advertising agency that admits that the page creation is "in preparation for a publicity campaign". Ironholds 14:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Assistant was one of the many other occupations this individual holds, its unfair and highly unnecessary that you or any one else target that one line out of the others. His client is very popular in the U.S. - but maybe thats something you have to be in the U.S. to know? Sounds to me as if someone has a little bit too much time on their hands! Talkoftheindustry (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you're commenting on it, you created it. I'd also like to point out TOTI's conflict of interest for the sake of fair play and all; working for an advertising company who's client is Eric Junior. WP:NOTABILITY for people is "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.". google comes up with nothing; you've got his myspace and a blog/news site run by him as sources. Ironholds 15:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm commenting on it, because I think what you're doing is highly unfair, and unnecessary for you to target a young, and promising individual. If it's going to just absolutely make your day, please go head and delete the article. Once his official website, and biography is complete and there are more "notable" events that show up via google - the article will be reinstated on wikipedia regardless rather his publicist inputs or not, I was simply trying to get an early start to prevent running into any errors of some having/using the same name or submitting any of the wrong information. Talkoftheindustry (talk) 15:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How's it unfair? promise doesnt matter; see "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". well-known people will be included, people who could potentially be well-known in the future will be included in the future. Ironholds 15:48, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment; the user who created the page has blanked it; should i take that as a sign he wants it removed? Ironholds 15:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.