The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to the season's article as the probably most consensual solution. Mergers are an editorial matter and can take place from the history. Sandstein 08:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Vinette[edit]

Emily Vinette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unsuccessful Canadian Idol contestant. with assertion of notability of having been "second in the Central Canada Exhibition youth competition". Borderline, in my view, brought here for consensus. Ohconfucius 10:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Canadian Idol (Season 3) --Steve _(Slf67) ^talk 11:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, meets WP:BIO as a reality contestent. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per precedent. No third party sources. One Night In Hackney 04:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 23:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep She has a bright future ahead of her. Nardman1 00:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Please see Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-12 00:31Z

• I've read it. Nardman1 00:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - wiki is not a crystal ball!!
• Merge to Canadian Idol (Season 3) --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 00:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No assertion that the subject has done anything noteworthy in the year-and-a-half since she was eliminated. Caknuck 01:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Idol is a big TV-series which has several million viewers, and those who finish in the top ten have performed numerous times in order to reach it. Does have independent non-trivial coverage here for example. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I wouldn't really call that non-trivial coverage. That's the standard media article each time a contestant is eliminated, all they do is change the name, song and judges comments. One Night In Hackney 16:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Canadian Idol (Season 3).--Vintagekits 16:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.