The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 12:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Montenegro, London[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We are not a directory, and there is no reason to suggest this building is notable in its own right. It is neither historic in character nor is the business transacted therein so vital as to confer notability on the building itself. The fact that Montenegro has an embassy in London is noted at List of diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom, and that appears sufficient for our purposes.

Note that I am not singling out Montenegro; this nomination could equally apply to Embassy of Moldova, London, Embassy of Cuba, London, High Commission of Tonga, London, High Commission of Saint Lucia, London, High Commission of Dominica, London, Embassy of Mauritania, London and many others in Category:Diplomatic missions in London. - Biruitorul ^Talk 23:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all embassies are not inherently notable. these are all merely confirming embassies existence and not meeting WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this one. The others haven't actually been nominated but nothing in the list jumps out as me as being worth saving so I'd probably support deletion of those too. This ridiculous diplomati-spam needs to be curbed. None of these buildings pass WP:GNG and I think there's an argument to be made that none of them inherit notability from the relationship between the two involved countries in each case. Office buildings aren't notable because of the companies they are leased to, nor the deals done between their walls. The building itself must be notable. This one isn't. Stalwart111 00:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

as an example, this one is just photos of the embassy. LibStar (talk) 01:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. These are well intentioned but inappropriate pages, usually created by the same guy. Szzuk (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.