The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 07:38, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elliott Stonecipher[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three sort of sources on him are available online: company/website profiles, blog entries/primary sources, and RS where he subject is mentioned in passing. None of it passes WP:GNG Mottezen (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Classic User:Billy Hathorn WP:REFBOMB without even a clear assertion of notability, much less substantive sources. Reywas92^Talk 15:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I thought we had freed ourselves from the plague that was Billy Hathorn created articles, but I guess I was wrong.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.