The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:G4. Identical copy, missed the previous deletion. SoWhy 14:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elix Polymers[edit]

Elix Polymers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP Cabayi (talk) 11:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 11:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 11:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as there is no evidence of notability. The refs are mainly recycled press releases that get picked up in trade pubs.TastyPoutine ^{talk (if you dare)} 12:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Since SoWhy moved the article I now see it's both G4 & G5 eligible, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ELIX Polymers, User talk:Croa8man. Unfortunately Bilby didn't tag Croa8man with the puppetmaster's name when blocking - where do I file the SPI? Cabayi (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.