- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence that this meets the GNG... and the dead CNBC source was only a press release. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 11:40, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Elite Serum[edit]
- Elite Serum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to be a non-notable product. Most of the claims here are sourced to examiner.com, which does not appear to be a reliable source. Diannaa (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I added information to this article the other day and attempted to upload a newer version of their logo. While The Examiner is a potentially unreliable source, the claims made by The Examiner are supported by other references. There is also a source to Business2Community and Seeking Alpha which are reliable sources. I searched the net and found more references as well. There were many press releases but a ton of reviews on the product. Not sure if this helps. --OperaJaws (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The references in the article are not reliable sources, nor could I find any coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete, the CNBC reference listed might push this over the notability line, but at present it's a dead link. Until I actually see it I won't be 100% convinced that this meets the WP:GNG. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.