The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There has not been enough discussion after 3 weeks to come to a clear consensus. As a side note, if the article does not "claim the significance of the subject", then perhaps the A7 criterion of Speedy Deletion should be used. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 03:15, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eestairs[edit]

Eestairs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not credibly claim the significance of the subject. --Anarchyte 22:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin: Peterposts (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
@Peterposts: The TreeHugger link you posted seems like a press release or advert for it and I can't findw where it says EeStairs patented the 1m2 staircase in the link you provided. Anarchyte 01:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 17:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 12:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.