The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edisoft[edit]

Edisoft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A WP:VAGUEWAVE is not convincing enough for this to even be soft-deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.