The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 11:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ecuador-Serbia relations[edit]

Ecuador-Serbia relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable bilateral relationship. Contested prod. This stub has no sources at all, and i can find no sources of any kind that would support this content fork from Foreign relations of Serbia and Foreign relations of Ecuador. There are no sources that demonstrate this subject is notable by itself (Serbia and Ecuador are very far away from each other and don't have much in the way of dealings with each other, so that's not so surprising.) So, it's a content fork, it's unsourced and unsourcable beyond trivia along the nature of "Serbian and Ecuadorean ministers shared cordial handshakes at international conference X" and is the very definition of what an encyclopedia is not. Bali ultimate (talk) 22:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Agreed this is a non-notable relationship between two countries. -Marcusmax(speak) 23:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Nick-D (talk) 23:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One of many of the random combinations that have been used to mass produce articles. Ecuador (13 million) and Serbia (7 million) are both small nations and it's doubtful that they would have any notable bilateral relations. Barring some conspiracy theory that the so-called death of Slobodan Milosevic is a hoax and that he is secretly living in Quito... never mind. Mandsford (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Seeing as one of the countries (Serbia) doesn't have an embassy in the other country, it's hard to imagine that this is a notable relationship. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 15:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - random bilateral pairing with no evidence of notability. - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Two more random countries with less of a combined impact on the world stage you would be hard pressed to find. Not notable. --BlueSquadronRaven 16:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• weak delete if there's nothing more added by the close of the AfD in 7 days. Weak because I admit I haven't myself actually searched. DGG (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Can anyone dig up news stories re: Kosovo and Ecuador's stance and Serbia's reaction? Computerjoe's talk 20:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • All covered right over here. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Establishment of embassies/consulates means that there are relations between the countries; finding the information to fill the article is just a matter of work from this point.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:21, April 15, 2009 (UTC)
  • The existence of embassies (not inherently notable) is covered at Diplomatic missions of Ecuador and Diplomatic missions of Serbia. - Biruitorul ^Talk 19:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Those article provide a different perspective and cannot be further expanded in the same way this article can be.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:28, April 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete could not find any meaningful articles which established any relationship. [1] LibStar (talk) 02:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.